COVID vaccines have a reputation in the public eye like no other. There are people who live and people who die. There was a senate hearing on the 9th of September of this year on “How the Corruption of Science has Impacted Public Perception and Policies Regarding Vaccines.” This senate hearing is investigative in nature. It attempts to find out the facts and the laws.
Misinformation is a crime of its own, having a non-factual data in science itself is a recipe for disaster. The vaccine research data were no exception to this either and this is during the COVID-19 era. A flawed study gives a misinterpreted public perception. Bias should not be overlooked; mortality risks inevitably increases at some point during the pandemic crises. The very early stages of the pandemic spread had limited to no research conducted on the efficacy, safety, and suitability of the vaccines. Doctors are liable to the tweets and at large how the public views the severity of the vaccine limitations, the health of the population and the policy making process as to how mass vaccine campaigns essentially need to be carried out in the rural and urban setting of the modern-day America.
“We set out to answer a fundamental question. What does the complete trial record actually show about vaccine testing? We’ve catalogued 1,088 randomised control trials from 1941 to 2025 involving over 10.5 million participants.”
Dr Jake Scott, Board-Certified Infectious Disease Physician, and Clinical Associate Professor at Stanford University School of Medicine
Thousands of flawed studies have been published in journals despite being reviewed. There is one study wherein it was never published. This public hearing by the permanent senate sub-committee aims to uncover it all.
“The result is there’s zero trials, zero, which were relied upon in this list of 6061 to license a routine injected vaccine on the CDC schedule that included a placebo. As well as zero trials of a vaccine used as a control to license a routine injected vaccine on the CDC schedule… this list supports the opposite of what it pretends to do…”
Aaron Siri, Ligation Attorney, Managing Partner of Siri & Glimstad LLP
A doctor is to be accountable for the damages his studies have caused.
“So, look, in PhD programs, you have to read original sources and you have to define terms. Let’s be crystal clear about the definitions of these terms because the fate of the Republic depends on getting these definitions right and Dr Scott is playing fast and loose with these definitions, so let’s be crystal clear about what we mean… the FDA has no regulations regarding the contents of placebos, so, manufacturers can put whatever they want… and can still call it a placebo by law… furthermore scientific journals have no regulations concerning the contents of placebos… everyone knows that such a trial would show harms.”
Dr Toby Rogers, PhD in Philosophy and Social Sciences, Political Economist
You remember how they say that lies catch up to you eventually?
Signing off,
Nivea Vaz
Credit: The Union Herald
Scriveners Online© 